Warning: include(/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/includes/code.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 2

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/includes/code.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 2
Clinical and Histologic Evaluation of Bone-Replacement Grafts in the Treatment of Localized Alveolar Ridge Defects. Part 2: Bioactive Glass Particulate
Warning: include(/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prdincludes/05_update/javascript.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 39

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prdincludes/05_update/javascript.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/quintpub/public_html/journals/prd/abstract.php on line 39
Follow Us      

LOGIN

   Official Journal of The Academy of Osseointegration

 
Share Page:
Back

Volume 23 , Issue 2
March/April 2003

Pages 129–137


Clinical and Histologic Evaluation of Bone-Replacement Grafts in the Treatment of Localized Alveolar Ridge Defects. Part 2: Bioactive Glass Particulate

Charles I. Knapp, DDS, MA, MS/Frank Feuille, V, DDS, MS/David L. Cochran, DDS, PhD/James T. Mellonig, DDS, MS


PMID: 12710816
DOI: 10.11607/prd.00.0514

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a bioactive alloplast and a physical barrier to augment localized alveolar ridge defects for the subsequent placement of dental implants. Twelve systemically healthy patients (aged 29 to 55 years) with inadequate dental alveolar ridge widths were selected for study. All patients completed initial therapy, which included scaling, root planing, and oral hygiene instruction. All ridge defects were augmented with a bioactive glass alloplast and a titanium-reinforced e-PTFE barrier. Vertical (height) and horizontal (width) hard tissue measurements were taken the day of ridge augmentation surgery (baseline) and at the 6-month reentry surgery. The change in ridge width varied from a loss of 1 mm to a gain of 4.5 mm, with a mean gain of 1.1 mm (P < .03). Eight of the 12 sites gained 1 mm or less. The difference in mean ridge width gain between maxillary and mandibular sites was not statistically significant (P > .08). Mean ridge width gain was 1.1 mm for both maxillary and mandibular sites. There was a loss in bone height of 0.3 mm from baseline. Four implants in four patients could not be placed because of inadequate ridge width augmentation. Histologic examination of the grafted sites revealed connective tissue encapsulation of most residual graft particles. In this study, bioactive glass particulate and an e-PTFE barrier did not consistently augment localized ridge defects for dental implant placement. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:129–137.)


Full Text PDF File | Order Article

 

 
Get Adobe Reader
Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files. This is a free program available from the Adobe web site.
Follow the download directions on the Adobe web site to get your copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

 

© 2020 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc

PRD Home
Current Issue
Ahead of Print
Archive
Author Guidelines
About
Submission Form
Submit
Reprints
Permission
Advertising
Quintessence Home
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Help